Chemo Will Kill You Faster Than No Treatment at All

Photo credit: bigstock.com

Photo credit: bigstock.com

It’s rather shocking, isn’t it? Doing nothing resulted in cancer patients living more than four times longer than those who undergo chemotherapy. You will never hear this from the mainstream media. Dr. Jones’s study results were published in the journal Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Back in 2004, a study was published in the journal Clinical Oncology, which found that chemotherapy is actually only effective in about 2 percent of cancer patients. This was based on the typical 5 year survival rate criteria, which really does not mean a person is “cured,” but health authorities would certainly like you to think so.

In fact, in a separate study, published back in 1979 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, stated that many of the typical procedures for diagnosing and the treatment of breast cancer, almost all of which are still used today, did nothing to lower breast cancer rates, nor did they increase the survival rates for those with breast cancer.

Although chemotherapy is pushed on cancer patients as a means of “curing” their disease, what they are not told is that these chemicals cannot tell the difference between cancerous cells and healthy cells. Chemotherapy is putting just enough poison in your body to try to kill everything inside you but stopping just short of killing you. Outright, anyway. Receiving repeated chemotherapy and radiation treatments kills the body a step at a time.

Chemotherapy hits your immune system particularly hard, and the majority of people never get recovered fully enough to maintain protection from common diseases, which can then lead to death. About 67 percent of people who die during their “treatment” do so because of infections that happen because their immune system failed.

Try to feed your immune system and increase naturally your blood cell count, so that your body’s fighting power strengthens. If you ever wondered how to increase white blood cells and wanted to try to give your body a boost, eat the right foods which are rich in vitamins and minerals.

Continue to Page 3

PrevPage: 2 of 3Next


3 Comments

  1. Shannon

    Sep 23, 2015 at 12:37 am

    This is one of the most untruthful, irresponsible, unbalanced, and dangerous articles that I have ever read.

    My mother survived breast cancer at the age of 49, now 70. Yes, she skipped the traditional radical mastectomy, but the University of Michigan team did use both radiation and chemotherapy treatment on her. Yes, it was painful, and she lost her hair, and she threw up, and it was not pleasant. But she survived. I still have a mother. Thank God. Thank her doctors. Thank modern medicine and modern technology. She would have died without them. How illogical and irresponsible of you to claim otherwise.

    You offer no alternatives in your article. While the current treatment is not perfect, without its challenges, nor is it pleasant, her doctors were upfront about the potential and likely complications. They told her how it would work. She knew it was the only way.

    Your article lacks a solid foundation. It is misleading and biased and presents a danger to the uneducated public that reads it and goes no further. I feel sorry for them. But mainly, I feel anger toward you if any of them actually follow your alleged claims as advice and find themselves soon in hospice care. That will be on your hands. Fortunately, I don’t believe your following to be that widespread. And at the very least, it has now been reduced by one.

    A word of advice from one of your former readers: Hire educated journalists.

    ~ Shannon M. Russell
    Daughter of a survivor of breast cancer who underwent chemo and radiation treatment.

  2. Marvin Zinn

    Nov 30, 2015 at 12:56 pm

    Reply to Shannon:
    We all should have our own choice. Yes medical standard procedures save lives, but personally I would rather die. I know alternatives, from which I stopped cancer growth with herbs after refusing surgery and radiation.

  3. carmiturchick

    Mar 5, 2016 at 2:25 am

    “Dr. Jones states that cancer patients who refuse conventional treatments live an average of 12.5 years.”

    Bullshit. I would love to see him try to get that data past peer-review.

    My mom was diagnosed with breast cancer sixteen years ago, had surgery and radiation, and then five years ago was diagnosed with lung cancer for which she got the traditional chemo and radiation, which did nothing, but then they tried Xalkori which completely wiped out all eleven tumors she had. She is still alive chasing her grandchildren around and taking Xalkori although, with no sign of cancer in her body for over three years now, they really do not know if she needs to.

    This article is obvious bullshit because it does not even mention that there are now various different kinds of chemo. Xalkori, for example, is effective for 50% of patients that it might work for (only works for a specific type of cancer mutation), while traditional chemo only works for 20% of patients. Now, yes, normal chemo and radiation treatment is very hard on a body and you might live longer not getting that treatment. But it might save your life and give you many years, it is all about making informed choices. My mom did not expect to see December of 2011 and she is cancer free right now. Eleven tumors, left untreated, will kill every single person within a pretty short period, far shorter than 12.5 years.

    Really disgusting that you have this article up. Shame on you.